Rossi Blog Reader

This website tracks recent postings to Andrea Rossi's Journal of Nuclear Physics, sorting the entries with priority to Rossi's answers, which appear under each question.


• Email to Andrea Rossi - Journal Of Nuclear Physics
• Website comments to the Webmaster (who has no contact or connection with Rossi).
• Updated: 2020-01-18 09:20:05.366739Z

  1. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    1. Are you refining your theory based on the results of current experiments?
    2. Will you publish a new paper based on the results of current experiments?

    Thank you very much,

    Frank Acland

  2. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    1 yes
    2 either this, or updating http://www.researchgate.net/publication/E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  3. Andrea Rossi

    Nigelk Sanders:
    Thank you for the suggestion, in some situations it could be useful.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  4. Nigel Sanders

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    Will a battery be needed for load change cushioning, to allow a smooth variation ?
    Total respect and wishes for you and your Team,
    Nigel Sanders

  5. Raffaele Bongo

    Hello A. Rossi
    In your comments you told us that once the E-Cat’s reactor has run out of combustible, it charges like you change a battery.
    Is it possible, that the customer may one day, change the reactor he would have in stock?
    All my support for your work
    Best regards
    Raffaele

  6. Andrea Rossi

    Raffaele Bongo:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  7. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    What aspect of your work is occupying most of your time and attention in this period?

    Best wishes,

    Frank Acland

  8. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Experiments with the SKL and theoretical consequences are the focus of our Team now.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  9. Anonymous

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Is it possible that sooner or later the Ecat will be sold in the internet, for example by Amazon ?

  10. Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    It is not impossible,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  11. Steven N. Karels

    Sven B,

    Solar plants have a couple of disadvantages (at least two):
    1. They only operate when the light is available (daytime, cloud cover, clean window, etc.)
    2. They degrade about 1% per year in their efficiency.

    On the other hand, an SKL-based unit potentially operates 24/7 for a 6 month or 1 year period. Then “remove and replace” maintenance is needed. Likely, the planned maintenance could be scheduled during non-peak demand hours and separately from adjacent units. For example, for an ensemble of 365 SKL-based units, one might schedule maintenance services of one SKL-based component each day, etc.

    Shipment could be by conventional means as the replacement SKL component is small and relatively light weight. An Electric Vehicle would suffice — it could be charged during non-duty hours and it would be environmentally friendly.

    The major application for SKL-based energy production, in my opinion, would be baseload power generation, running 24/7 for months at a time. Solar and other technologies have their place in an integrated energy production effort. An integrated approach will likely be implemented as the new SKL technology moves into the commercial marketplace. Early adapters will likely be the initial customers. If they are successful, it will then spread as economics dictate.

    Andrea Rossi must have a mechanism to produce and support a variable growth demand. This is not a trivial problem. I suspect production of SKL components will be a secondary problem or limitation. Human resources (sales, maintenance, management) will likely be a more difficult task to perform optimally.

  12. Buck

    Dear Andrea,

    I have no doubt you have read and seen how the Ecat SKL nurtures a great deal of thought and discussion at E-CatWorld, by many remarkable people from around the world.
    The following may be seen as a view for what your team now re-imagining your Business Strategy has had to face and how your audience during the February/March presentation might imagine about the future.

    Link>> https://e-catworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/SKL-Economics.pdf

    You face the great challenge as you artfully expressed in your exchange with Salvatore Boi on November 29th, 2019: “to break the cage”.

    As always, I wish you, your team, and your wife well.

    Sincerely,

    Mason Ainsworth

  13. Andrea Rossi

    Buck:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  14. Sven B

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I forgot to add that my comparison was based on 25 years lifetime.

    Kind regards
    Sven B

  15. Andrea Rossi

    Sven B:
    Sorry, I do not agree. Just remake the math.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  16. Gloria

    Dear Andrea:
    I too want to thank you for the link to Dirac you put in the answer to Listenbetter. It is very important.
    Best Regards,
    Gloria

  17. Andrea Rossi

    Gloria:
    I agree,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  18. Sven B

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I will expect that one of your biggest concerns at this moment is how to present E-Cat SKL with the most favorable lifetime climate footprint.
    It must be a real challenge.
    Comparing a 20kW solar power system to a 20kw SKL system ( 24/7- 1-year fuel) the customer is facing 50 times more transport logistics with the SKL.
    To minimize the financial and environmental costs of this significant logistics you need at minimum an exponential expansion of local SKL factories and full control of the logistic chain including using only SKL-powered vehicles.
    Do you agree?

    Kind regards
    Sven B

  19. Andrea Rossi

    Sven B:
    OK

  20. Sam

    Hello DR Rossi

    This is another video about Paul Dirac
    and how he fits into the big picture
    of Physics.

    https://youtu.be/PmKhvpBZQCM

    Regards
    Sam

  21. Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  22. Rod

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I appreciated your answer to “Listenbetter” and most of all I appreciated the lecture of Dirac of which you gave us the link in your delighting comment.
    Cheers
    Rod

  23. Andrea Rossi

    Rod:
    Thank you for your attention,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  24. Andrea Rossi

    Keith Thomson:
    I cannot comment so far.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  25. PlasmaFan

    Dear Andrea,

    The marijuana industry needs the E-Cat SKL!

    https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/cannabis-industrys-dirty-energy-secret

    They can use the light, electrical output, and waste heat!

    This could be a gigantic market for the E-Cat SKL. I believe you should contact one of the leading growers ASAP.

  26. Andrea Rossi

    PlasmaFan:
    This is a kind of industries I will never deal with.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  27. On Njewje-Nic

    Mr. Rossi.

    1) Approximately, how many ecat-sk’s were produced in Your robotic factory
    until now ?

    2) When did the official production start ?

    3) How many factories are operating ?

    Best regards

    On

  28. Andrea Rossi

    On Njewje-Nic
    1- confidential
    2- we already produced Ecats
    3- one
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  29. Burt

    Dr Rossi,
    Thank you for the link to the lecture of Dirac. It also helps to better understand your paper
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions

  30. Andrea Rossi

    Burt:
    Thank you for your attention,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  31. Stephen

    Hi Andrea.

    May I ask… if and when a device needs recharging. Will it be necessary for the user to replace:
    A. The whole 10cm cubed device?
    B. just a smaller component or components from the device?
    C. Both options will be possible?

    D. If B is the replaceable component is it much smaller than the whole device?

    Best Regards

    Stephen

  32. Andrea Rossi

    Stephen:
    A
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  33. Sam

    Hello DR Rossi

    This is a video about Paul Dirac
    who like you made Florida his home.

    https://youtu.be/fWo010EsiYk

    Regards
    Sam

  34. Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  35. KeithT

    Dear Andrea,

    On 23rd November 2019 you announced that a test of the E-Cat SKL had “Obtained permanent self sustaining mode with production of strong excess of electricity, generating more excess of electricity than of heat.” and “we got more electric energy that the electric energy necessary to make the Cat work. The increase is strong”.

    This breakthrough was almost two months ago, following this you have indicated that the work was so important that you and your team have worked constantly over the Christmas and new year festivities without break, in this period the original E-Cat SKL has been working 24 hours, 7 days a week presumably requiring constant supervision, also in this time several additional E-Cat SKL’s have been produced, it is likely that each has included some refinement, and in this short time you have likely observed benefits and possibly even discoveries during tests.

    I would expect that you are trying to improve the output ratio of electricity to heat / power density as this will have benefits for how the E-Cat SKL can be used, the multiples in difference from having to deal with 30%, 20% or 10% of output in the form of heat has large implications, if heat is a major output it has to be treated as an asset to be recovered, if it becomes minor it may be possible to dissipate as a waste, (like a desk top computer).

    Of the following what is closest;

    A. In the short time since your breakthrough, have you observed sufficient incremental benefits or important discoveries as to require more time for further improvement / testing / validation, before submitting an E-Cat SKL to the testing authority.

    B. You have selected an E-Cat SKL to put forward but need more time for reliability testing

    C. Although time is tight you are on schedule and will try to keep the presentation within February.

    D. You cannot comment.

    Regards,

    Keith Thomson

  36. Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    In my comment of yesterday in response to Listenbetter there was a typo in the link to the important paper of Dirac with his Nobel Price lecture. The link now has been corrected.
    Sorry, my mistake.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  37. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    How much advance notice will you be able give about the planned E-Cat SKL presentation? I would think it would be an event that you would like to publicize as much as possible, so it will be important for people to prepare for it.

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  38. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    We will give this information when we will be ready. At the moment the situation does not allow a date.
    Thank you for your important attention to our work.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  39. L. Listenbetter

    It is NOT in light speed.

    The “C” appears just in the formula.

    The electrons DO NOT wiggle in lightspeed.

  40. Andrea Rossi

    L.Listenbetter:
    This comment answers to both your comments of today.
    You should “listen better” when you read my paper, so maybe you can understand what I wrote, albeit I think you are not paid to understand, but for other kind of things. I discovered who you are ( it is not very difficult ), but I want to answer anyway, because the stupidities you write must be “listened better” to be duly exposed.
    As I wrote on
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    ZBW is the movement at speed of light on a circular or helicoidal trajectory of a massless elementary charge that has a pure electromagnetic momentum
    p = eA
    equal to the product of the elementary charge e time the vector potential A associated with the ZBW current.
    THE SPEED OF THE ELECTRON IS ALWAYS SUB LUMINAL, WHILE THE SPEED OF ITS CHARGE IS ALWAYS AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT !!!
    P.A.M. Dirac in his Nobel lecture wrote:
    “It is found that an electron which seems to us to be moving slowly, must actually have a very high frequency oscillatory motion of small amplitude superposed on the regular motion which appears to us.
    As a result of this oscillatory motion,the velocity of the electron at any time equals the velocity of light.”
    Reference here ( not for you, a paid character killer, because you are, so to speak, ‘differently able to understand’, but for the Readers ):
    https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/dirac-lecture.pdf
    Dear Readers: I strongly suggest this reading, to better understand my paper.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  41. PlasmaFan

    Dear Andrea,

    Do you think that the phenomena theorized in the following paper could help explain some of the energy gain in the E-Cat QX/SK/SKL?

    https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0207046.pdf

    Since you claim your system is no longer utilizing LENR as an energy source, I’m curious where the power is coming from.

  42. Andrea Rossi

    PlasmaFan:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  43. Rod Walton

    On Power Engineering issue of January 14th 2020:
    DOE launches fund challange to accelerate US energy storage supply chain, development

  44. Andrea Rossi

    Rod Walton:
    Thank you for the update,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  45. Giuseppe

    Dear Andrea,
    based on your knowledge, would the E-Cat-SKL work in the absence of gravity and outside our atmosphere?
    Regards, Giuseppe

  46. Andrea Rossi

    Giuseppe:
    I do not know precisely, but gravity should not have any effect on the Ecat, as far as I know.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  47. Aleksei Savchenko

    @ Eric Ashworth
    January 11, 2020 at 6:24 PM
    Dear Eric Ashworth,
    I accept your point of view and treat it with understanding. There is no contradiction between these groups of questions, but on the contrary they complement each other.
    a) For example, Rossi’s response to my second group remark once again helped me to understand that his new ECat SKL design has little in common with the previous version, well-known to all that he referred everybody to his paper.
    b) Third group is of great importance to me but from the other point of view. The matter is that in many countries these studies are considered unscientific by authorities that are incompetent in scientific matters and their decisions are based only on the opinion of the corrupt scientists engaged in expensive projects such as ITER, CERN, etc. And this is despite the fact that the LENR effects obtained by dozens of different methods, and one of them – Ecat of the Andrea Rossi team is already close to commercialization. Therefore, the presentation of Rossi and the release of new products to the market will force our authorities to change their attitude. And if even they do not support these scientific activity, then at least not to interfere with them. For example, I had to stop partially the experimental part of my work and cannot publish new results accumulated during this time under my name even on the Internet. Therefore, many thanks and respect to Rossi and his team and it would be nice if he presented the results, even if they are intermediate.
    c) The first group of questions is important to everybody for all readers, not only engaged in research. The matter is that we do not know the physical nature of LENR process as they can be produced by many various methods with receiving different final results, as I mentioned in my in previous comments (January 10). Most likely we are interacting with energy Physical Vacuum (PhV) or ether and do not need addition portions of fuel. Therefore various unrepeated nuclear transmutations, found in LENR processes is a side effect of another unknown process, that lead to the formation of so-called “strange” radiation, discovered experimentally and accompany LENR effects. That is why special forms of bacteria in water liquids can transform elements (these data was many times confirmed experimentally before E-Cat started). These processes also refers to LENR effects and need scientific explanation. Moreover, in our Institute engaged in developing novel materials and technologies for atomic application we transformed r/a Cs into stable Ba showing the way for diminishing of r/a waste accumulated by atomic stations as well as for cleaning Chernobyl, Fukusima and other dirty regions.
    And this gives a chance for atomic energy electricity generation to survive partly in the future under development of LENR technology. But usage of bacteria is very complicated technology as they are very moody and inefficient. Using more simple ECat technology we can more easy solve this problem Moreover, if we manage to control the ”strange” radiation (in some my experiments weak antigravity effects appears) we can alloyed any metal by distance and receive any alloy composition and structure. But on the other hand not all novel received elements will be safe and can be used for dirty purposes. It is depends on us and as Andrea say ”all in God hands”. Even a harmless reaction like turning lead into gold can cause financial collapse
    Best regards,
    Aleksei

  48. Anonymous

    Is the “zitterbewegung” a phenomenon related to some form of luminescence ?

  49. Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Luminescence is a spontaneous emission of light not caused by heat.
    What is “Zitterbewegung” is described in my paper
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    It is related to the nature of electron and consists on the “tremor” of the electron that makes the electron have two speeds: the speed along its direction and the speed of the trajectories made by such “tremor”, a vibration that has the speed of light.
    If you are referring to the Ecat: the light of the plasma, that you can see well in
    http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    is obviously not a luminescence, being made by the heat inside the reactor.
    To understand well what is the ZBW the best publication I know is:
    “Maxwell-Dirac Theory and Occam’s Razor: Unified Field, Elementary Particles, and Nuclear Interactions”, Amazon 2019, by Giorgio Vassallo, Andras Kovacs, Antonino Oscar Di Tommaso, Francesco Celani, Dawei Wang.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  50. L. Listenbetter

    Claire
    January 13, 2020 at 8:24 AM
    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    What I appreciated most in your paper
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    is the understanding of the fact that even if the electron is a fermion, and therefore cannot travel at c, it is possible that it has a zitterbewegung ( vibrations ) with the speed of light, maintaining its fermionic translation speed.
    This is a revolution in the electron’s potentials concept

    This is nonsense.
    Zitterbewegung is nothing else than a movement.
    And therefore never can be luminal.
    It is forced to by subluminal.

    Best regards

  51. Prof

    Dear Andrea:
    Please find hereunder a link to a very interesting paper of Donald Reed that involves also your work:
    “Bose-Einstein Condensate:Bridge between Matter-Non Matter- Potential for Revealing New Physicsand Inner Nature of Reality”
    pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f7a6/fd0b3beab174ad78f90975c5d3b99766ca_g

  52. Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    Thank you for the reference.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  53. carlo

    our Readers are independent parties that can convince me I am not sleeping and I am really writing this.now please convince us that we haven’t been dreaming for 10 years

  54. Andrea Rossi

    Carlo:
    Thank you for your attention to our work. We are working at the maximum of our possibilities.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  55. WaltC

    Dr. Rossi,
    Are your existing SK customers also interested in the SKL device (with direct electric output) or are they mainly interested in a heat-only ECat application?

    Thanks, WaltC

  56. Andrea Rossi

    WaltC:
    When ready, it might fit all of them.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  57. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I believe you posted a 70% availability on the eCat running since Nov 2018.

    1. Is this correct?
    2. If so, is that averaged over the last roughly 14 months?
    3. If also so, are you seeing an improvement over the last month or so?
    4. What is the availability over the last month or so?

  58. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    1 yes
    2 roughly one year
    3 yes
    4 roughly 80%
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  59. WaltC

    Dr. Rossi,
    If you can say–assuming the appropriate certifications, what’s the smallest sized appliance/device that you think the current generation of ECat-SKL might fit into and power?
    – a toaster?
    – a portable room heater?
    – a clothes dryer?
    – a furnace room water heater?
    – an electric motor bike?
    – an electric car?

    Thanks, WaltC

  60. Andrea Rossi

    WaltC:
    I think they will be interested also to the electricity, when we will be ready.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  61. Chuck Davis

    Dear Andrea,
    the article in the link below will provide support to the Ecat during storms bearing blackouts:
    https://news.yahoo.com/more-100-000-homes-still-232200982.html
    Warm Regards,
    Chuck Davis

  62. Andrea Rossi

    Chuck Davis:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  63. Claire

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    What I appreciated most in your paper
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    is the understanding of the fact that even if the electron is a fermion, and therefore cannot travel at c, it is possible that it has a zitterbewegung ( vibrations ) with the speed of light, maintaining its fermionic translation speed.
    This is a revolution in the electron’s potentials concept

  64. Andrea Rossi

    Claire:
    Thank you for your attention,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  65. Italo R.

    Dr. Rossi,
    I apologize for this impertinent question of mine.
    Not interested in receiving recognitions from the mainstream science ?
    To obtain this honor, a good working time of 70% on E-Cat SK (but also 5% of a good work) would be more than enough.
    Sincerely,

    Italo R.

  66. Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    I am working to get results.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  67. Fox

    Dear Andrea
    In all hypothetical and theoretical terms, will it be possible in the future to produce single SKL cells much more powerful than the current one?
    For example from a Giga W?

  68. Andrea Rossi

    Fox:
    I do not think so.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  69. Dear Andrea,
    while I always follow with interest your Ecats for the joint production of electricity and heat, I would be pleased to have information on the only heat production systems that you have rented to some users.
    You can synthetically – with grades from 1 to 10:
    1) Express your satisfaction with the services provided so far;
    2) Express your perception of users satisfaction?
    Can you provide a percentage of the ratio between regular operating time and the time required for stops due to assistance interventions carried out by you personally and by your team?
    Warm greetings.
    Gian

  70. Andrea Rossi

    Gian:
    1- 7
    2- 8
    3- 70%
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  71. Chuck Davis

    Will the consume of the charge decrease if the Ecat works at 50% of its power ?
    Chuck Davis

  72. Andrea Rossi

    Chuck Davis:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  73. Christian Scholl

    For the possible presentation of the Ecat SK Leonardo, I think there are two dates fit: 02 02 2020 and 2 02 2020: four 2 make 8, infinite energy.
    Christian Scholl

  74. Andrea Rossi

    Christian Scholl:
    He,he,he…
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  75. toussaint francois

    Dear Andra Rossi

    One question please, this year will you deliver your products to France ?

    Warm Regards,

    Toussaint François

  76. Andrea Rossi

    Toussaint Francois:
    51%
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  77. Marco

    Dear Andrea,

    The ECat installed in November 2018 has still the original charge because of intermittent usage by the customer or because the charge lasted longer than predicted?

    Regards,
    Marco.

  78. Andrea Rossi

    Marco:
    It is lasting more than expected,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  79. toussaint françois

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    My best wishes of succes for 2020.

    May I ask you one question please, what is the percentage of probability that you will make the presentation of the SKL in February?

    Warm Regards,

    Toussaint François

  80. Karl-Henrik Malmqvist

    Dear Readers of the Journal of Nuclear Physics blog:
    Many of you think that as soon as the independent testing has been done and the E-Cat SKL is verified it is just to press a button and out come the E-Cats from a factory!

    If we think of a standard product development process it is like this:

    1) Prototypes (magnitude of 10), that are handbuilt, are veified, tested and used for further product development and adjustments. (Here we are now).
    2) Preseries units (magnitude of 100) that are made semiautomatic. Maybe the computerboard with the necessary transducer conditioning comes from one subcontractor´s small series assembly line. The output inverterelectronics come from another subcontractor´s small series assembly line.
    The reactor parts come from secret places and everything is assebled by hand. Units are tested in labs and with special costumers. The design is improved and adjusted for better automatic assemly.
    3) First serial production (magnitude of 1000). The automatic production line is adjusted. All units are thoroughly tested and what is within or out of specification is decided.
    4) First serial production line works perfectely. More production lines are added.
    5) Production in several factories.

    All of this will take its time, much depending on Leonardocorps partners (especially steps 3-5).

    Best Regards,
    Karl-Henrik, Sweden

  81. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Interesting info about the E-Cat SK installed in November 2018. Is this the only E-Cat SK operating at a customer site? If so, why has it not been deployed more widely?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  82. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    No, it is not.
    Thank you for your attention to our work,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  83. Roberto

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    If your Ecat SK Leonardo will work, it will be a potential tombstone for the oil business in the long term: somebody has been killed for much less.
    Take care of yourself, maybe the assassination can not necessarily made physically, maybe they will use their power of fire to assassinate your character and dwarf your work.
    I wish you all the best,
    Roberto

  84. Andrea Rossi

    Roberto:
    I am dedicating all of myself and my time to a work I believe is useful. All the rest is in the hands of God.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  85. Nils Fryklund

    Dear Andrea!
    Some questions about E-catSK, 22kW, which was been installed at a customer 19 november 2018:
    1. Is it still giving 22kW at the customer?
    2. Is the customer satisfied or has there been much problems?
    3. How much fuel powder weight do you guess it has consumed?
    Best regards
    Nils Fryklund

  86. Andrea Rossi

    Nils Fryklund:
    1- yes
    2- satisfied
    3- still the original charge
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  87. Karl-Henrik Malmqvist

    Dear Andrea,
    Let me try to interpret Steven N. Karels question.

    Let us say you have 2 black boxes both weiging 6 kg.
    One black box contains an E-Cat SKL complete with control and inverter electronics.

    The other black box contains a Li Ion battery.

    Assuming the testers are not allowed to open the boxes how can they tell which contains the E-cat SKL and which contains the battery?

    Answer: Knowing that the maximum battery energy capacity for Li Ion is 265 Wh/kg and applying an electrical load for 265 W to the battery means that the battery is empty after 6 hours.
    This means that the testers must run the test for at least 6 hours with a 265 W load to be shure that it is not a battery in the E-Cat SKL box.
    To be really shure they should at least run the black box with the E-Cat SKL 10 times this, 60 hours if the black box weighs 6 kg and can give 265 W electrical power output. If it can give more output than 265 W the test time can proportionally be shorter. If it weighs less than 6 kg, the testtime can proportionally be shorter.

    Best Regards,
    Karl-Henrik (testengineer)

  88. Andrea Rossi

    Karl-Henrik Malmqvist:
    I agree.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  89. Andrea Rossi

    R. Leckt Lummel:
    Enough
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  90. Sam

    Hello DR Rossi

    Can you say when the third
    party tests of the E-Cat SKL
    will be completed.

    Regards
    Sam

  91. Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    No.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  92. Steven N. Karels

    Andrea Rossi and Chuck Davis,

    To differentiate chemical-based versus nuclear-based power sources, one must look at the specific power (W/kg) and the specific energy (Whr/kg). By plotting each, as in a Ragone plot, one can differentiate the type of underlying specific power. Implicit in the specific energy measurement is that one runs the device long enough to either begin to run out of fuel or to clearly eliminate a battery or similar chemical source.

    For example, assume the SKL has a mass of 1kg and a power output of 1kW. The specific power is 1,000 W/kg. The specific energy is the specific power times the duration of the test (hours). So the observation must be of sufficient time to preclude the use of a battery or chemical source, if the purpose is to negate the Troll’s claims of a battery or fuel cell being hidden within the SKL. A Li-ion battery has a specific energy of around 200 Whr/kg. So to preclude the SKL demonstration unit from being powered by a battery, one would want to show at least a 10X time greater than that provided by a Li-ion battery, or about 5 hours.

  93. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  94. R. Leckt Lümmel

    Hi, Mr. Rossi.
    Can You tell us, how far the robotic assembly lines are developed?

    Best regards.

  95. Eric Ashworth

    Dear Aleksei Savchenko,
    I found your articles most interesting especially the scientific issues (1) Obviously this is your major interest in the LENR process which is mine also. The other two groups you refer to are for me and as you imply less important i.e. group (2) speculative questions driven by curiosity which could be considered as an unnecessary distraction to an important project but which I find of equal interest and group (3) those readers not involved in research who are understandably impatient to get the technology out because of its extreme importance in providing cheap, clean, safe energy. It is each of these groups that I find refreshing in the annals of scientific research and technology. I have mentioned this many times before regarding the fact that science and technology is not a subject for the chosen few but merely involves a curious human mind of which many people possess and you have to accept each aspect as we all function on our own unique wavelength of thinking. I am one that would never use the word ‘we’ when referring to a phenomena whether it be understood or not understood because we each have our own individual thoughts and ideas i.e. a none understanding in one department does not necessarily include all, otherwise the individual human mind would be considered useless. This for me is the strength of the JONP as it represents an open channel for discussions to take place between academic minds and those of lay persons but I do understand your concerns.
    Regards Eric Ashworth.

  96. Frank Acland

    @Chuck Davis

    I think the question about running the SKL for a long time is in response to people who will claim that the E-Cat SKL has a hidden battery inside it, so it is nothing special.

    If it can run for longer at a given power than is possible with the best battery, this may address this claim.

    Best regards, Frank Acland

  97. Chuck Davis

    @Steven N. Karels:
    It seems to me that it would be only necessary to operate the Ecat at the maximum output until it reaches steady state to estabilish the power density. It is not going to change over time.
    Warm regards,
    Chuck Davis

  98. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    You asked for a clarification on “2) Would I be correct in assuming that although the team performing the current or upcoming test may want to run the E-Cat SKL for days, that in only several hours or less the total electrical output (factoring in the weight of the device) would mean that it had exceeded the energy density of the absolute best chemical batteries on the planet?”

    I understand the question to be how long of a run time is necessary to distinguish SKL’s source of power from chemical compared to nuclear. Reference my previous postings on Ragone plots. I suspect at approximately several hundred Watts of electrical power output, it will take days of continuous operation to distinguish the source of energy, assuming the mass of the SKL.

  99. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    I still do not understand the sense of it.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  100. Jane

    Dr Rossi:
    If the Ecat SK Leonardo will work, it will stop the wars caused by the quest for oil, which is equal to say that it will stop all the wars around.
    God bless the work of your team,
    Jane

  101. Andrea Rossi

    Jane:
    Thank you for your sustain to the work of our Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  102. Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    OxiCool uses only pure water as refrigerant to cool homes.
    Uses heat and only 1/10th the amount of electricity.
    https://techxplore.com/news/2020-01-oxicool-pure-refrigerant-cool-homes.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter

    Best regards,
    Iggy Dalrymple

  103. Andrea Rossi

    Iggy Dalrymple:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  104. KeithT

    Dear Andrea,

    You have developed the E-Cat SK maximising heat output, you have taken the E-Cat SK and developed the E-Cat SKL from this targeting electrical output minimising the heat, is it theoretically possible to develop another E-Cat variant where you maximise Ultra Violet light output with minimal heat.

    Whether this is worthwhile pursuing would also depend on the market, UV is widely used for disinfecting water supplies for example.

    Regards,

    Keith Thomson.

  105. Andrea Rossi

    KeithT:
    It is not possible.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  106. Andrea Rossi

    OPlasmaFan:
    1 what you can see is shown in http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    2 sorry, I do not understand clearly the question. Can you kindly rephrase it ?
    3 yes
    4 it depends on many factors
    5 confidential
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  107. Anonymous

    Which is the percentage of time you dedicate to the theoretical issues vs the experimental activity ?

  108. Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    They go together, each one is part of the other.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  109. Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  110. CC

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Which technology will be used for the soldering of the components of the Ecat SK Leonardo in the industrial production phase ?

  111. Andrea Rossi

    CC
    Robots
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  112. PlasmaFan

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    1) Can you see plasma sheathes or double layers in the ballerina of the E-Cat SKL?

    2) Would I be correct in assuming that although the team performing the current or upcoming test may want to run the E-Cat SKL for days, that in only several hours or less the total electrical output (factoring in the weight of the device) would mean that it had exceeded the energy density of the absolute best chemical batteries on the planet?

    3) Are you in negotiation with a major company with experience in manufacturing to produce large numbers of E-Cat SKL units?

    4) If you believe the electrical output could end up being 70%, what percentage of the output do you believe will be in the form of visible light?

    5) Does whatever process that produces anomalous energy output (heat, light, electrical output) take place within the area of the ballerina or also in other portions of the internal volume of the reactor?

    Thank you.

  113. Prof

    Dr Rossi,
    Curiosity: are you reading a paper right today? If yes, which one?

  114. Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    This:
    http://isinn.jinr.ru/past-isinns/isinn-22/progr-27_05_2014/schaeffer.pdf
    Suggested by a mamber of our Team.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  115. Aleksei Savchenko

    3. Dear Andrea, we are tired to wait. When will you finally set the day and invite us to the presentation and what will be shown there.
    Nice and very emotional demand for those, who was never engaged in developments especially referring to breakthrough. Andrea many times mentioned, that “we are proceed through unknown territories so, surprises, negative or positive as they might be, are always possible”.
    In defense of Andrea I can ask everyone (including me). What have I done to promote development and help Rossi? Maybe he spends a lot of money on research taken from the taxpayers of my country? For comparison, take the same ITER program, which has pumped hundreds of billions of dollars from the budgets of many countries over 50 years. By the way, its current status can be viewed on https://tnenergy.livejournal.com/147900.html (you can see only pictures – it is enough for understanding). And they plan to complete its industrial implementation only at the end of this century. Here is a feeding trough for scientists. We need to find a likeness of Greta Tuborg and launch it with a call to clean the world from unscrupulous scientists.
    Please, be patient and wait. To my mind Andrea could show to us only intermediate results (presentation) with output electricity in February, and then, no rush, bring everything to a commercial product.

  116. Andrea Rossi

    Aleksei Savchenko:
    Thank you for your insight.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  117. Aleksei Savchenko

    2. Dear Andrea, if we assemble a more powerful device from the Ecat SKL small cubes and put it:
    into a bicycle, car, train, plane, helicopter, spaceship (then everywhere, as long as there is enough imagination), while it will be great to live, we will save the planet and how much it will cost (you have to pay for happiness – my comment).
    That is not the fact as ECat cube is complicated system producing not only electricity, but also heat. Concerning heat. Have you ever stood by an open oven heated above 1000 degrees? It is ECat cube. And if it will be 100 ECat cubes? The electric pipes from Cu or Al melted at below temperatures as well as most wire insulation. We need cooling systems.
    Concerning electricity. The output electricity should be standard – 220V and 50 hertz, so we need a system for converting direct current into alternating current and a transformer. And all these electric elements are situated inside a well-heated cube. Do you imagine this? Plus control devices.
    Of cause, all this will be modified by Andrea and his team but not in a short time as 23 researchers, as he mentioned in the blog is not enough on the stage of industrial-scale developments. To my mind just now he can put his ECat device, even the old version on a balloon to heat the air and make non-stop flights for advertising purposes.
    In the future he will certainly achieve all that you require of him now, but give him time and do not disturb with unnecessary questions.

  118. Andrea Rossi

    Aleksei Savchenko:
    Thank you for your insight. We have resoved the issue of the cooling system and, by the way, heat is an asset, not a liability in most of cases. The former generations of Ecat made heat alone…
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  119. Aleksei Savchenko

    1. Dear Andrea, we are not fully satisfied with you published paper with theoretical explanation of the LENR effect you received earlier (in previous ECat version).
    The first question is simpler as it refers only to the scientific ECat issues and be in the frame of the scientific Journal. Unfortunately most of readers do not specify the unclear scientific issues. I think this comes from a lot of respect for Rossi. I also respect him and his promotion of LENR all over the world without spending our money. But I also believe that as a scientist, he himself is interested in the search of truth.
    Concerning his published papers I can only mention positive and controversial aspects.
    a) Positive aspects. Five versions of ECat device already exist and Andrea describe the theory for only one an old Lugano tested version and did not pretend to be a theory of all other LENR effects, as well as of the other ECat versions. For that type of device they (with coauthor Norman Cook) done this theoretical work more or less accurate based only on the isotopic changes of LiAlH4-Ni fuel (transformation Li7 through Be to He as well as Ni60 through Cu to Ni62. As rightly noted Alexander Prosvirnov – the creator of the website http://www.lenr.seplm.ru (to my mind, the best site in the world by its informational content), “now the number of theories and their authors (including me) is already more than a hundred, and they can’t stand each other strongly (excluding me). As an example, we do not know the physical mechanism of gravitation, but we use it well in our life. Though, on the other side we cannot create flying vehicles based on antigravity phenomena.
    b) Controversial aspects. We do not sure that in other experiments the final isotopic content was the same (including novel ECat version producing electricity), consequently the theory needs modification. Not clear aspects with gamma radiation release during both transmutation process (during Ni to Cu to Ni transformation – positron appears and annihilated with electron forming severe radiation – gamma quants. Not described the type of energy involved into the process and its influence on additional heat release. I mean hydrogen, adsorbed in Ni, nanostructure of Ni powder, (any surface, defects can accumulate surface energy of special type and promote process). I think Rossi also use fullerenes additions, as they can generate and accumulate electrons that can further participate in various reactions as well as increase electric tension – additional energy. Why power density of the device do not changed while fuel consumed. Moreover, Li vaporized and cannot find in the working zone of the fuel. How then it can work?
    Why Alexander Parhomov, who repeated Andrea Rossi experiments, did not find any changes in the same fuel composition? Moreover, in inner surface of ceramic tube outside the fuel he find a lot of Ca, forming by nuclear reaction Al+O=Ca.
    What kind of current he implement to heat fuel – may be with high frequency and voltage, or may be induction heating (practically the same) promoting the processes. And the main question, what about “strange” radiation, appearing in practically all LENR processes. He does not mentioned it. At the same time its formation that leads to LENR effects and fuel transmutation (nucleus transmutation is a side effect), therefore the isotopic composition of different researchers is different and we found different nucleus outside the working zone).
    How he can receive electricity following his theoretical model? It can only be produced if the LENR excess heat happens at the account of the chaotic pulse movement of electrons. Then just by applying a magnetic field to it, you can order the movement of electrons and get a current.
    c) Positive aspects. On the other hand Andrea should not open all his Know-How. He does a lot and shares his knowledge with other scientists all over the world. Thanks to him and his information Parhomov and others designed the similar devices and conformed LENR effects. He promotes novel knowledge all over the world. And we also should take into account that we only on the way understanding LENR effects.

  120. Andrea Rossi

    Aleksei Savchenko:
    I agree with you.
    Only, I am more optimistic about the industrialization of the Ecat SK Leonardo.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  121. KeithT

    Dear Andrea,

    Has any pre-test examination by the testing authority started?

    To have the product of years of your work examined in detail, scrutinised, questioned, sometimes having to amend supporting documents to the format and detail the authority requires, the authority with their own internal discussions and meetings that you will not be party to, taking whatever time that they feel they need to take, having to add supplementary information asked for by the authority that you may or may not see as being essential, generally doing whatever it takes to satisfy the authority without giving away proprietary information, and all this often before they will decide to examine the equipment or allow a test to proceed.

    A very nerve-wracking stressful experience, but worth it to get to where you want to be, I hope all proceeds well.

    Regards,

    Keith Thomson.

  122. Andrea Rossi

    KeithT:
    Information about the testing will be given at the presentation.
    Thank you for your suggestions,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  123. Raffaele Bongo

    Hello A. Rossi

    You have published an electrical efficiency of between 70% and 80%.
    Personally I find that there is a very important difference between these two figures when it comes to performance.
    Can you specify which parameters depend on the variation in efficiency, environmental conditions: temperature pressure, power demand, etc?
    I look forward to your presentation
    All my support to your entire team
    Best regards
    Raffaele

  124. Andrea Rossi

    Raffaele Bongo:
    I hope those data will be conrirmed.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  125. Sture Andreasson

    Mr Andrea Rossi,
    1 will the February presentation be delayed?
    2 will the manufacturing be made also in SwedenP
    Best regards,
    Sture Andreasson

  126. Andrea Rossi

    Sture Andreasson:
    1 so far, I can say noo
    2 yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  127. Aleksei Savchenko

    Dear colleagues,
    Thank you very much for your comments in the frame of the JNP forum with expressing yours scientific view on LENR problems. But over time, it turned into a question-answer system (only Rossi should be responsible for answers), and most of the questions are quite simple. It looks natural at first glance, after his statement on novel ECat SKL design, capable of generating electricity in addition to heat. I guess this situation is not fully satisfied those, who engaged in scientific issues and I believe that Andrea too – he would like to receive from us assistance, but not only demands and requests. as Koen Vandewalle accurately pointed out in the comments yesterday, that the blog of JNP transforms into «the blog about the progress of Ecat development”.
    In order to come back to scientific direction of the journal I would distinguish three main groups of questions, rather requirements for Rossi, try to analyze them, as well as try to answer from the point of view of an ordinary scientific researcher who is not a member of the Rossi team, (I know the LENR issues more or less as conducted experiments myself, which can partially be attributed to LENR), and therefore I can be more substantive.
    Conditionally, I could divide them into three groups:
    1. Dear Andrea, we are not fully satisfied with you published paper with theoretical explanation of the LENR effect you received earlier (in previous ECat version).
    2. Dear Andrea, if we assemble a more powerful device from the Ecat SKL small cubes and put it:
    into a bicycle, car, train, plane, helicopter, spaceship (then everywhere, as long as there is enough imagination), while it will be great to live, we will save the planet and how much it will cost (you have to pay for happiness – my comment).
    3. Dear Andrea, we are tired to wait. When will you finally set the day and invite us to the presentation and what will be shown there.

    Further I will dwell on each of these groups of questions.

  128. Roberto

    “They” are the two engineers that are working in Padova (Italy) on parts of the ITER. The broadcasting was on RAI TG 24 several days ago
    Roberto

  129. Alex

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    I studied yor paper
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    watching at the same time the video
    http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    Doing this, I discovered many things. I tink it is one of the most important publications of the last ten years.
    Looking carefully at the plasma, I think that there are different charge potentials inside it, between the center and the perimeter of the plasma sphere.
    Did you search in this direction?
    Cheers
    Alex

  130. Andrea Rossi

    Alex:
    Probably you are right.
    Thank you for your attention to our work,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  131. Gerard McEk

    @ Roberto:
    I cannot imagine ‘they’ said this. Who are ‘they’?
    Anyway Andrea is right, they use Tritium which is radioactive and very dangerous for most lifeforms because it can form radioactive water. I guess it must be 30,000 million, not billion, although hot fusion has cost humanity maybe 50 billion already. Besides, the reactor will become also radioactive once they get it running, if that will happen ever. Also, the process is very inefficient. You need extremely cold nearly next to extremely hot and a lot of power to create the required environment. They should not force nature.
    It is better to use the process developed by SAFIRE. See safireproject.com and their last presentation, very interesting and entertaining, I can recommend! Or, maybe even better, the ECat SK Leonardo. Let us hope it arrives soon!
    Regards, Gerard McEk

  132. Anonymous

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    In ten years of R&D you have not yet been able to show a product that everybody can buy.
    Why?

  133. Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Because I need more time.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  134. Gina Frusciante

    Dr Rossi,
    You still think will be able to make a presentation within february 2020?

  135. Andrea Rossi

    Gina Frusciante:
    I still am optimist about that,
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  136. Roberto

    Dear Andrea:
    Last week has been introduced in the news the R&D on course for the ITER in Italy.
    Thay said that:
    1- the first industrial application will be at the end of this century
    2- the nuclear fusion is safe and clean because uses only clean raw material, like hydrogen and helium
    3- the temperature inside the plasma will be 200 000 °C, but no problem because between the plasma and the walls of the reactor there will be a magnetic field that will completely insulate the walls
    4- the whole will cost 30 000 billions , but it is nothing respect the profits once it will work
    Your opinion ?
    Roberto

  137. Andrea Rossi

    Roberto:
    No comment, but I’d add a point 5: what about tritium ?
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  138. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    The 70% efficiency you mentioned in previous postings regarding electricity production, does that include conversion efficiencies to output nominal AC power (e.g., 120VA, 60 Hz)?

  139. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    It depends on the systems,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  140. Daniel De Caluwé

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    From 2011 on, but only from time to time, I visit your JNP to follow up how your hard work (and that of your team) proceeds. Some months ago I was happy to see that you already planned a new presentation (in februari of this year 2020) to present to the world – if I’m right – your fifth generation of E-Cat (1: E-Cat; 2: Lugano Hot Cat; 3: E-Cat Qx; 4: E-Cat SK and fifth: 5: E-Cat SKL), the E-Cat SKL that generates directly electricity without the need to transform heat in a Carnot cycle. Of course, this again is an enormous breakthrough once more!

    As many people become cynical about our capacity to tackle climate change, I hope you still plan this presentation to be ‘strong and global’? So that hope can come back in the world? (In Belgium, most parties seem to agree now to go on with two of our youngest nuclear power plants for the next 10 years beyond their normal lifespan, of course, in combination with new projects to expand our renewable capacity in (mainly off-shore) wind and (on shore) sun. But, like in the rest of the world, the expansion of the lifespan of our old nuclear power plants can’t go on endlessly, so we really need your technology in the near future. Therefore I hope your next presentation will be ‘strong and global’, so that hope comes back in the world!).

    As we need your technology so badly, I wish you and your team all success with the new E-Cat SKL (if I’m right the fifth generation of your E-Cat?) and,finally, the world-wide recognition you deserve for your very hard breakthrough work. The world needs it and also needs to know that there’s technological hope to tackle our environmental problems…

    Kind Regards,
    Daniel De Caluwé
    (Belgium)

  141. Andrea Rossi

    Daniel De Caluwé:
    We are working strongly to present a product as soon as possible.
    Thank you for your attention to our work,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  142. Eric Schlinger

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    1 will the sales of the Ecat SLK started only after the R&D and certifications will heve been completed ?
    2 is it opportune to start orders to be in a waiting list ?
    3 which Countries will be served first ?
    May God bless your work for the humanity
    Eric Schlinger

  143. Andrea Rossi

    Eric Schlinger:
    1 yes
    2 yes, but the pre-orders are not binding until a specific proposal has not been accepted
    3 all
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  144. Sven B

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    Several years ago we registered our interest in buying E-Cat Home units at your site ecat.om.
    1. Can you confirm that this means we are standing already in the cue for E-Cat SKL ( home version)
    and will have offers from you when it is available.
    2. Can you inform how many requests for E-Cat Home you already got during all these years?

    Kind Regards
    Sven B

  145. Andrea Rossi

    Sven B:
    1 preMATURE
    2 enough
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  146. Romano

    Hi Andrea
    can you tell us if testing has started?
    If yes, is there any outcoming that you can share wit us?
    My best regards
    Romano

  147. Andrea Rossi

    Romano:
    We will give information about the tests during the presentation.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  148. Dan C.

    Dear Andrea,

    With fossil fuel heat, requires on average 3Kw of heat for 1Kw electric.

    With a 10Kw SKL with 70% conversion, do you get 3Kw heat and 7Kw electric or does it have a ratio similar to fossil provided heat.

    Best wishes on the test.
    Dan C.

  149. Andrea Rossi

    Dan C.:
    The Ecat SK Leonardo should give deirectly 70% of current without necessity of conversion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  150. Harvey Hamel

    Dear Andrea:
    I logged into the JoNP this morning, but there were no data beyond July 31 2019. At the same time, though,
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    was working fine.
    Have you been hacked…again ?
    Best Wishes,
    Harvey Hamel

  151. Andrea Rossi

    Harvey Hamel:
    we did not notice any anomaly. Thank you for the advice, though.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  152. Karl-Henrik Malmqvist

    Dear Andrea,
    Maybe this question is a bit premature, as your main focus now is on stability, reliability, endurance and soon the production process of the ECat SKL.

    An oldfashoned lightbulb for home application has a filament that works very well, but is sensitive for vibrations and strokes, especially when hot.
    Lightbulbs for cars have been tested for thousands of hours on shakers with different vibration inputs before going into production.
    Also common electronics for cars have to be tested in a similar way.

    Now to my question. Do you think it will be hard to make future version of the ECat SKL vibration resistent for car and mobile applications due to the design of the plasma and electrodes?

    Best Regards,
    Karl-Henrik, Sweden

  153. Andrea Rossi

    Karl-Henrik Malmqvist:
    We already made tests to check the effects of vibrations on the Ecat: there are no effects.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  154. Koen Vandewalle

    I find the comments from Plasmafan, and the answers to them and around them, very enlightening. I think it is a shame that Andrea Rossi does not elaborate on that. This blog is called Journal of Nuclear Physics, and not “The blog about the progress of E-Cat development”.

    Suppose we had propulsion technology that allows us to accelerate a material spaceship to a significant percentage of the speed of light. With the reasoning that we can follow from fellow followers of this journal, it seems logical that the matter as we know it would gradually become unstable. The least strong interactions between the waves that form our matter would soon be disturbed. As a result, some of the “building blocks” of matter will disintegrate and may even be swallowed up by other building blocks that in turn will cause all kinds of reactions and interactions.
    Plasmafan’s suggestion that the E-Cat should become more efficient as speed increases, reinforces my understanding of this.

    It seems unthinkable that “life” as we know it can exist at such high speeds. Life is a very complex interaction of equally complex material phenomena.

    This makes it impossible to move to other planets, with the science-fiction purpose of founding a colony there, for example. Even if we discovered a livable planet. Unless we manage to move our entire galaxy along with it.

    What we can send to far-off places through all kinds of special techniques is information. Obviously, without obligation, unless that information would directly direct the thoughts of other living beings to influence their physical behavior. This can of course only be developed by highly advanced, universe-loving civilizations. To want to destroy something that is unattainable is almost a definition of nonsense.

    If I were the creator and designer of the universe, and I have to take into account species such as “humanity,” the material inaccessibility of other worlds would be a foundation of my creation.

    For the time being, I will use this as proof of the existence of a Deity.

    Does someone make a better proposal?

    With the most curious regards,
    Koen Vandewalle

    P.S .: have those reliability problems with the SKL been solved a bit and does the device behave according to your wishes?

  155. Andrea Rossi

    Koen Vandewalle:
    Thank you for your insight.
    Answer: we are working well and I continue to be optimistic about the scheduling, but, again, we are proceeding through unknown territories, so surprises, negative or positive as they might be, are always possible.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  156. WaltC

    Dr. Rossi,

    It seems to me that your E-Cat SKL device is a huge leap forward in many ways– in terms of direct electricity generation and compactness, it opens up the door to all sorts of additional applications.

    For example, there’s an $800 emergency power generator that can continuously generate 3KW of electricity, weighs 100lbs, has a volume of 4.6 CuFt, runtime of 3hrs per tank of gasoline and, unfortunately, produces fumes that necessitates it being placed outdoors.

    1) Do you see that as a possible future application of the E-Cat SKL?
    2) With Better Specs overall (cost, volume, weight, power & run-time)?
    3) Safe to be used indoors?
    4) Within the next 2-4 years?

    Thanks, WaltC

  157. Andrea Rossi

    WaltC:
    1 yes
    2 yes
    3 yes
    4 tried Amazon for a cristal ball: not available product
    Warm Regards.
    A.R.

  158. Rod Walton

    On Power Engineering issue of January 7 2020:
    Preparing Your Plants Security to Meet growing Needs
    Rod Walton

  159. Andrea Rossi

    Rod Walton:
    Thank you for the update
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  160. Kay

    Test, develop, demonstrate the same procedure over and over again – could one of the ECat presented stop climate change? we all follow this development because our hope depends on it. best regards Kay

  161. Andrea Rossi

    Kay:
    We will make the presentation of the Ecat SK Leonardo only if we will be sure that the answer to this question is YES.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  162. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Will the third party testing involve using calorimetry?

    Thank you very much,

    Frank Acland

  163. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    The data of the testing will be given during the presentation,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  164. Wilfried Babelotzky

    Dear Andrea,
    Is it theoretically possible to hope that in future the Ecat can be scaled down enough to be fit for watches etc ?
    Wilfried Babelotzky

  165. Andrea Rossi

    Wilfried Babelotzky:
    I am not able to answer,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  166. R. Huje Cmuka

    Mr. Rossi.

    Are people from poland working in Your team?

  167. Andrea Rossi

    R. Huje Cmuka:
    Not yet.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  168. Andrea Rossi

    Torbjorm Soederlund:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  169. Szymon Blachuta

    Do you think the Ecat SKL can be scaled downt to be able to energize like watches, phones etc ?
    Szymon Blachuta

  170. Andrea Rossi

    Szymon Blachuta:
    No.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  171. Torbjorn Soederlund

    Do you think the next presentation will be more close to a massive marketing then the former ones ?

  172. R. Huje Cmuka

    Yes i meant this page.

  173. Andrea Rossi

    R. Huje Cmuka:
    OK
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  174. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    You reply to Nolan is interesting. Does this mean that you have enough satisfaction with the original E-Cat SKL model, to now work on improving the power density?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  175. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Improving power density is always important. During the tests we continuously discover things.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  176. R. Huje Cmuka

    Hi, Mr. Rossi.

    When will be finally able to buy a domestic ecat box, like the one shown on your webpage???

    Best regards.

  177. Andrea Rossi

    R. Huje Cmuka:
    I suppose you are talking of the website
    http://www.ecat.com
    or
    http://www.leonardocorporation.com
    If you are referring to another website, please specify to let us control if it is authorized.
    About your question: we are working very hard on this issue, but I still am not able to give a date.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  178. Roberto

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    your paper
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    is also linkable to the long range concept of the lecture of Carl Oscar Gullstrom made during the presentation of the Ecat QX
    Google: “Ecat QX presentation Stockholm November 24 2017”
    Correct ?

  179. Andrea Rossi

    Roberto:
    I’d say yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  180. Nolan

    Are you also working during this period on the reduction of the dimensions of the module, maintaining the same power ?

  181. Andrea Rossi

    Nolan:
    Yes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  182. Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, I do get a chuckle out of your reply to Plasmafan January 4th. as it informs readers how important it is to deal with physics as a practical subject and not theories concerning science fiction such as those proposed by Einstein which I know some people took as serious issues although I am of the opinion they were for self entertainment and his close associates but it could be said that there is a serious side to such thoughts. For instance lets consider the ‘static and mobile mechanics of energy interaction’. This infers that as velocity of an object increases over a given distance, time shortens and thereby at absolute velocity time equals zero, distance equals zero and the object no longer resembles what it was before it started to move. Conversely, if an object stops moving, any distant destination becomes impossible to reach, time has no meaning and the object remains the same but if the static object is comprised of individual pieces and those pieces move then it could be said that the ‘static and mobile mechanics of energy interaction’ applies to two contradictory scenarios that applies to the law of physics. Maybe it was this aspect that intrigued Einstein. It is interesting to think about if considering thought experiments. Regards Eric Ashworth

  183. Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Thank you for your insght,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  184. PlasmaFan

    Hello Andrea,

    I’m honored to have made the 50,000th post on the Journal of Nuclear Physics!

    When it comes to my question, I wasn’t necessarily thinking about relativistic effects due to approach the speed of light. I’ve learned that space itself – even what we view as empty – is in reality an ocean filled with a wide variety of “stuff” including neutrinos, WIMPS (weakly interacting massive particles), the electron-positron sea of Dirac (constituting a type of aether or zero point energy field), and of course all sorts of waves (longitudinal and transverse).

    Could your ballerina (a self organized plasma ball with internal structure) be able to catch a portion of at least some of the “stuff” I’ve mentioned in the above paragraph? If the plasma ball can capture neutrinos, for example, I can only theorize that it could capture even more when the apparatus would be moving at high speed.

    A very rough comparison – not exactly what I’m referring to – would be the following concept.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bussard_ramjet

    Except that instead of capturing hydrogen, the ballerina would be snagging (catching) a portion of the “stuff” passing through it. Then at higher speeds, since a greater quantity of “stuff” would be passing through it per unit of time, the energy output produced by the ballerina could increase.

    (The fact that your device is not producing energy via either LENR or traditional nuclear reactions inspires these thoughts in my mind. I’d love to hear more about where you think the power produced from the E-Cat SKL is coming from.)

    Thank you!

  185. Andrea Rossi

    PlasmaFan:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  186. Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  187. Andrea Rossi

    Gavino Mamia:
    Thanks,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  188. Gavino Mamia

    Salve Dott. Rossi
    Mi piacerebbe tantissimo poter usare E-Cat SKL per il mio barbecue.
    Non vedo l’ora di poterlo acquistare.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcg9zJ6aK-A&feature=youtu.be
    Saluti
    Gavino Mamia

  189. Andrea Rossi

    Gavino Mamia:
    The video of the lonk you cite does not work.
    Thank you for your attention to our work, even if your expectations are quite minimalistic…the Ecat could feel dwarfed ! ( just joking )
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  190. PlasmaFan

    Dear Andrea,

    Theoretically, would your E-Cat SKL produce more output when moving at high speed (lets say it was on board a space craft at some small percentage of the speed of light) compared to at rest on the surface of the Earth in someone’s laboratory?

    I’m asking this because it seems that if the E-Cat SKL is extracting energy from an unknown source (perhaps known to you) that permeates space, then the faster it moves the more waves/particles of that unknown source it would encounter.

  191. Andrea Rossi

    PlasmaFan:
    Your comment is the N. 50 000 of this blog !
    Thanks to you and to all our Readers for the attention you all continue to think our work deserves.
    Answer:
    When an object tends to travel to reach the speed of light in the vacuum ( = 300 000 km/second ) the time tends to become zero, the mass tends to become infinite and the length tends to contract along the direction of the motion. Therefore while our spacecraft accelerates to reach c, the kWh/h should increase quite a lot, because the hour should become more and more slow to pass. But to obtain a useful effect the spacecraft should reach a speed of thousands of km/s ( = millions of km/h ). So, albeit theoretically it is thinkable, practically this effect can be reached only in science fiction.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  192. Wilfried Babelotzky

    If you have experienced (minimum) energy capacity, you can measure V and A at the output, and compare capacity with delivery: this could be a gauge.
    Best Regards,
    Wilfried Babelotzky

  193. Andrea Rossi

    Wilfried Babelotzky:
    Thank you for the suggestion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  194. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    1. Given your plans for a presentation of the SKL next month, are SKLs already undergoing testing by the independent evaluator?
    2. Are you still planning a Feb 2020 presentation

  195. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    1 confidential
    2 so far, yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  196. Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  197. Chuck Davis

    Dear Andrea:
    Is the Ecat SKL supplied of a fuel gauge ?
    Warm Regards
    Chuck Davis

  198. Andrea Rossi

    Chuck davis:
    It is impossible.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  199. KeithT

    Dear Andrea,

    In your paper you mention, “A critical, cathode-temperature-dependent, threshold of electron density is an important precondition for the creation of such structures.”

    Is it a prerequisite to induce the nuclear interactions you describe, to have an artificial constructed environment, or is it possible this could happen in nature under rare circumstance, producing energy to be observed in stellar objects?

    See “Markarian Galaxies” on Wikipedia, this refers to catalogues of Steller objects with excessive amounts of ultraviolet emissions, Wikipedia – “Some objects are actually giant glowing regions of ionized hydrogen in a galaxy”.

    Regards,

    Keith Thomson.

  200. Andrea Rossi

    KeithT:
    I am not able to answer your interesting question,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  201. Italo R.

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    If SKL is much smaller than SK, I suppose that its nominal power is lower than the SK.
    Is it right?
    Sincerely,
    Italo R.

  202. Svein Henrik

    Dear Andrea.
    May be 02.02.2020 will be a date to remember for your followers?
    Best regards for the year end the demo.
    Svein Henrik

  203. Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    Premature.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  204. Ironman

    Dr Rossi,
    Is the reactor of the Ecat SKL much smaller that the Ecat SK’s reactor we saw on
    http://www.ecatskdemo.com ?
    Thanks if you can answer,
    Ironman

  205. Andrea Rossi

    Ironman:
    Yes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  206. Giuseppe

    Dear Andrea,
    have you already tried to connect a load or some kind of utility to the SKL output. if yes what it was?
    Regards, Giuseppe

  207. Andrea Rossi

    Giuseppe:
    Yes. This information will be given during the presentation.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  208. Teacher

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Reading
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    I understood that the Aharon-Bohm effect is at the base of your theoretical system: do you agree ?
    All the best
    Teacher

  209. Andrea Rossi

    Teacher:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  210. Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Your answer to eernie1 mainly covered my questions to you about planning, it crossed with eernie1’s, so no need to answer/publish this.
    You replied to eernie1 that you are not ready for testing yet.
    1. Are there serious problems?
    2. Or can the test go ahead anyway, but less ‘impressive’ then you believe it is possible?
    3. In other words: are you developing further improvements?
    Still good luck and brilliant brainwaves!
    Thanks, kind regards, Gerard

  211. Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    This information will be given only during the presentation.
    Thank you for your kind wishes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  212. Dear Dr Rossi,

    From on-going discussions I have understood that electrons are made in the E-Cat box through some advanced nuclear physics. But electricity generators as known them allows electrons to enter the generator at one end and exit from another end where the two ends are connected at some point as to close the electron travelling loop. The closing point is the electric load at some point far away from the generator. That is how our electrified world works. But if the E-Cat makes electrons how can the loop be closed?

    Best wishes to your success.

  213. Andrea Rossi

    Calle H.:
    Closed loop means, in this case, that the Ecat generates the electricity necessary to energize itself, plus an excess of electricity and heat.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  214. R. Lisa Huje

    Hehehe, maybe You already confirmed that…

  215. Andrea Rossi

    R. Lisa Huje:
    Still managing the drinks of the last night of the year ?
    When you are sober, send your comment, if you like. The next nonsense will be spammed.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  216. Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Another year of hard work has passed and finally a breakthrough of the E-Cat into the energy world can be expected.
    No doubt you have some ideas of when things will happen. I guess it may be it is already cast in stone.
    Can you tell us if the planning is already crystallized and if possible when the test will start and how long it will last and when/where the presentation will be?
    I wish you all the succes in the world in the preparation and presentation. The world needs the E_Cat SK Leonardo and its introduction will have an colossal impact. May 2020 be the year of the E-Cat!
    Thanks, kind regards, Gerard

  217. Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1 no
    2 no
    3 no
    We are just working to respect the scheduling of the public presentation.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  218. eernie1

    Dear Andrea,
    You must have a good idea of the date when the demonstration of the self sustaining device will be conducted and who will conduct the demonstration. I cannot call it a test because the testing should have been already done to the satisfaction of the demonstrators.
    I understand that there may be minor changes in time but within a week would be satisfying for your readers. We would be less anxious if this date would be revealed.
    Anxious regards.

  219. Andrea Rossi

    Eernie1:
    This information will be given only during the presentation. The date has not been decided yet because we are not ready for it.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  220. R. Lisa Huje

    Hi, Mr. Rossi.

    Can You confirm my statement?

  221. Andrea Rossi

    R.Lisa Huje:
    I did not receive any statement from you. Probably lost in the spam. Can you kindly resend it ?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  222. KeithT

    Dear Andrea,

    Is there anything theoretical that would stop you getting 100% electricity output from an E-Cat?

    Regards,

    Keith Thomson

  223. Andrea Rossi

    KeithT:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  224. LilyLover

    Dear Andrea,

    Very very Happy New Year!!!

    May you proceed with joy and strength.
    May your dream of maximum good for the most come true.

    You’ve worked tirelessly, may you “chill-out” (relax) a little bit in 2020!

    With your clarity of vision 20/20, did you dream up of a new vision 2020 for the mission 2020?

    Take care.

    Sincerely,
    LilyLover

  225. Andrea Rossi

    LilyLover:
    The mission we are mainly focused now is: to perform with the Ecat SK Leonardo.
    Thank you for your kind sustain
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  226. Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, Your paper L.R. particle interactions is in line with my own theory, one arrived at many years ago in tandem with my unifying field oscillation technology. As you are aware the subject is vast so brevity is a key issue, although not without its drawbacks.

    To extract energy out of structure requires its disintegration being the opposite of of its creation. Which everyone is aware of. Without exotic electron clusters it is impossible to extract the energy and without the force within the exotic electron cluster it is impossible to create structure. The Casimir effect and vacuum polarization are related to the force. The Aharonov-Bohm effect I was totally unfamiliar with but having read-up on it I do not believe it to be that important as I believe it merely refers to measurable variables with regards an interacting reaction similar to the study of where a cricket ball would go when struck by a bat. What I mean is, does it matter i.e. I do not believe it to be an issue.

    The Casimir force creates structure (it is itself a creation) and binds structure together by creating/maintaining an ‘economy flow’ that it creates for self preservation (there is an internal and external economy flow to every structure. The external flow is referred to as the coulomb barrier and provides the structure with an insulation by oscillations of wave energy under the control of the Casimir force because it is a construction of the Casimir force. Because the coulomb barrier oscillates it provides the structure with its system of identity i.e. allows for molecular interactions without being able to merge and lose identity. The Casimir force is between structure but the force does not originate from where it is detected i.e. find the origin of the force and get closer to the mystery.

    This subject is all about a force acting upon either free particles or that within structure comprised of particles or that of between structures and therefore makes the subject complex by being contradictory unless the entire field is understood with regards to being unified which involves understanding the energy cycle i.e. from active free particle to quiescent structure and back to being active. Exotic electron clusters will in certain circumstances and situations clog up an intended reaction because of the particular situation (when for instance burning coal this problem is acceptable and of no consequence) at the nuclear level it is a detriment to the end result. When nuclear power plants extract energy they use an inferior process and consequently are left with a toxic slag due to an incomplete cycle. It is able to be overcome but why use conventional high energy material. No need when there is LENRs. and exotic electron clusters.

    As an added piece of information with regards my pre history and consequent interest in the JONP. My technology as previously described and embodied into the design of an aircraft i.e a mechanical mechanism of atomic geometry when constructed by industry i.e. tax payers money would be able to lift a million gallons of water. Consequently, Australia would not have the problems it has today regarding fire control or that which it will encounter in the future. This aircraft I was aware of would require a special fuel to make it independent in an intended situation. At the time I was unaware of LENRs but when I became aware, many years ago, this I realized was the final frontier in completing the project. I truly believe that to gain independence in the energy sector you need to understand the ‘unified field’ from a practical aspect and not one from speculative theory. I have stated this before, only maths and geometry are required to design any system, once operational and proven then the effects can be studied and projected. Of course long range particle interactions are the key to LENRs but the technology of exotic particles is in its infancy and from what I believe due to my understanding of the ‘unified field’ there are no problems.
    Regards, Eric Ashworth independent Researcher.

  227. Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  228. TK

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Can you inform us about the Country the work with the Ecat SKL is progressing in, at the beginning of the year 2020 ?
    Congratulations for
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    surprisingly the most read paper published on Researchgate: a stunning success not just for you, but for the LENR in general,
    Good luck,
    Ted

  229. Andrea Rossi

    TK:
    We are making the preparation of the Ecat SKL in the USA and in Europe.
    Thank you for your attention to our work: about the paper, I too am really stunned !
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  230. Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog
    Happy New Year,
    A.R.

  231. Renato

    Dear Andrea,

    I wish you a New Year 2020 plenty of health and success !
    May this be the game changing year for the E-Cat diffusion all over the world,
    crowning the monumental work you did since so long time.

    My best 2020 wishes !
    Renato

  232. Andrea Rossi

    Renato:
    Thank you and my best wishes for the New Year also to you,
    A.R.

  233. Martyn Aubrey

    Dear Dr Rossi,

    A very Happy and Successful New Year to you and all your team!

    The World will soon get a wonderful surprise at the beginning of this new decade, as your Ecat SKL creates a new era of clean and plentiful energy.

    Monumental Regards,
    Martyn Aubrey

  234. Andrea Rossi

    Martyn Aubrey:
    Happy New Year also to you, but…
    Fly down…
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  235. Sam

    Hello DR Rossi

    This video says what I hope
    the year 2020 will be.

    https://youtu.be/XIex6FwsXiY

    Happy New Year
    Sam

  236. Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    Thanks for your link and your hopes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  237. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    With a new decade starting tomorrow, what is your hope for 2020 with regards to your work?

    Happy New Year!

    Frank Acland

  238. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Introduce the Ecat SKL in the world.
    I wish a successful New Year to E-Catworld and the Readers of your blog,
    A.R.

  239. Xavier Pitz

    Dear Andrea, GodelMetric,

    I think GodelMetric was referring to “Moiré” patterns
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moir%C3%A9_pattern
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvWF_Q5-Kt8

    Happy & successful new year 2020 to all !

    Xavier Pitz

  240. Andrea Rossi

    Xavier Pitz:
    Thank you for the lonks,
    I wish too a successful 2020 to you,
    A.R.

  241. Manfred the Teacher

    Happy New year, Mr Rossi !
    May the Ecat become the game changer !
    Moirè is an effect, having several identic waves in overlay
    Greetings from germany,
    Manfred the teacher

  242. Andrea Rossi

    Manfred the Teacher:
    Thank you for the explication. The effects we use are described here:
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    Happy New Year to you !
    A.R.

  243. Matias Mattsson

    Hi, Mr Rossi !
    1 do you resonance the H to the Pd then, when it is “filled” strike it with a “hammer” to fuse ?
    2 do you answer personally all the questions ?
    Best Wishes for the 2020,
    Matias Mattsson

  244. Andrea Rossi

    Matias Mattsson:
    1 no
    2 yes
    Thank you for your kind wishes, likewise to you and Yours
    A.R.

  245. GodelMetric

    Dear Andrea,
    Thank you for your dedication to this technology of greatest importance! You have gone where you are needed most. :)
    I am curious if you have looked into modelling the nuclear interactions using a moire? When many copies of the same pattern are oscillating or shearing past each other, their interactions create a pattern that exhibits perpendicular motion and magnification – it seems that the magnification-effect, a coherent ‘wave’ of activity like in a flock of birds, might be facilitating long-range interactions between particles, or the appearance of particles at detectors too far for their usual lifetimes’ flight, perhaps even behind shielding… including that pesky Coulomb barrier. I also have a hunch that funneling hydrogen down a carbon nanotube, you can wiggle the electrons to create a transmutation beam, ideal for creating rare elements, but that’s just my strange dreams talking.

  246. Andrea Rossi

    GodelMetric:
    What is a “moire” ?
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  247. Ulrich W.A. Kranz

    Dear Andrea,
    4 questions:
    1 will the Ecat SKL need a heat exchanger ?
    2 will it be able to erogate 90% of electricity ?
    3 is it controllable by internet ?
    4 are you designing a more powerful module ?
    With my best regards,
    Ulrich W.A. Kranz

  248. Andrea Rossi

    Ulrich W.A. Kranz:
    1 it depends on the needs of the client
    2 not so far
    3 yes
    4 no
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  249. Dear Eric Ashworth,

    My questions to Andrea were rather about me trying to reconcile the two papers and to gain some understanding about how they are related. I’m not so much doubtful, but rather I try to connect the dots to see the full picture.

    Kind regards,
    Mattias

  250. Andrea Rossi

    Mattias Andersson:
    Thank you for your kind attention to our work and Happy New Year to you and yours !
    A.R.